Evidence of incompetence of VIT and its council

THE EVIDENCE
I will display evidence from the tribunals, showing why this matter against myself dispalys administrative corruption of a high order.

As you know, in 2008 I was deregistered as a teacher. Since then VCAT (the watchdog of administrative corruption of public bodies like VIT) has said that, the the allegations, on viewing the weak evidence, did not warrant the deregistration of a teacher in Victoria.

VIT though has pushed that I have re-apply for reregistration, as my previous re-registration would have been finished by now and they have the right to ascertain fitness and conduct again, given the reregistration.

Unfortunately this is a manipulative ploy. This is because any conditions of re-registration, are based on the contested findings of the previous hearing.

SHIRKING VCAT ORDERS
At VCAT, VIT was said it would act in good faith, to move on to re-register myself. To state that the allegations from principals at Vermont Secondary College were contested, VIT has not done this. This might amount to Cyberbullying and Active illegal actions of VIT, against the LAW.
It was instructed by the authorities to expedite this quickly. Instead VIT has delayed this and not fulfilled its legal obligations by VCAT's order and the statements it made at the tribunal, which are secretive, from their embarrassing content for VIT. Since then, I have been told to pay a $140 application fee, which had already been forked out previously for example.

I don't have the funds to apply, from VIT's continuing action, which sees me unemployed and unable to get work form its aggressive public destruction of my reputation. As such I am foced to defend myself and will expose VIT, DEECD and other government elements, until they are brought to justice. This is any citizen's natural duty, I would think.

VIT, here shows that it has little interest in transparency or accountability to the public. So that true scrutiny cannot be applied to its corrupt practices.

Furthermore VIT was asked by VCAT, to remove allegations that it has since withdrawn, these have not been removed from the VIT website. It has not removed these. Because VIT has acted in poor faith, I will show clearly why the VIT lie in their determination and why they are incapable of evaluating and assessing the competence, fitness or standards of teachers in Victoria.

THE CORRUPT PEOPLE
In the next few weeks I will highlight the evidence and why VIT must be brought to justice and its corrupt elements prosecuted. I believe this includes Susan Halliday and Terry Hayes. I also believe Carmel White (DEECD Conduct and Ethics) and Tony Bugden (General Manager of HR DEECD) must be censured, if not fired, for lazy administrative incompetence. These are unfit for the trust of the Victorian Public.